Historic architecture is what creates a sense of place. Bucktown has very little sense of place. if it were not for the few "landmarks" that existed here, it would be impossible to distinguish it from any other new development on Chicago's north side. There is this common misconception that historic buildings are worse than their modern counterparts. While there are basketcases that truly do require intervention, many historic buildings can be just as habitable as new construction with a little bit of finesse. New construction, at least in Chicago, almost always requires a building to be torn down. After this occurs, a new building has to be built. Think about the cost and resources that are wasted by dismantling an already existing structure. It is much more "green" to use an already existing building and renovate the interior to satisfy the wants of an owner. This also allows the neighborhood to keep its already existing character - the very character that makes it one of the 77 existing Chicago neighborhoods.
Bucktown is becoming a utopia for young, wealthy, families that tend to overlook the past. They want modern amenities and rooftop terraces. This can be achieved with adaptive reuse of old buildings. Instead, the neighborhood has become a hideous display of modern, lifeless condominiums that leave little to be desired. This has become the tale of much of Chicago, and it is alarming to think that these historically diverse areas are becoming cookie cutter eyesores to be inhabited by suburban yuppies.

Nice post Essingliger
ReplyDeleteIf you end up writing building descriptions, I'm sure they'll be great!